“ú–{Œê English | |||
Thorium Tech Solution Inc. (TTS) | |||
About TTS |
Features of the
new Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor (Th-MSR) for which
TTS owns Key Technologies
(1) Nuclear
proliferation and terrorism resistance:
Because of no plutonium production
from Th-MSR, unlike current solid Uranium fuel based
reactors, it does not result in having the atomic bombs.
Therefore, Th-MSR is very important for nuclear
non-proliferation policy and path to make era of peace
without nuclear weapon..
(2) Little
high-level nuclear waste production and lower risk
of environmental pollution:
Compared with curren solid Uranium
fuel based reactors, Th-MSR produces extremely little
high-level nuclear waste. This advantage makes the risk
of environmental pollution significantly lower.
(3) High
safety-no severe accidents in principle and
practically:
As Th-MRS is liquid fuel based
reactor without having solid nuclear fuel rods, there
is, in principle and practically, no possibility of
severe accidents as occurred in Three Mile Island and
Chernobyl before, which caused great risk of core
meltdown and/or large radioactivity release.
Furthermor, operation of Th-MRS is conducted under nomal pressure in normal pressured container, unlike under high-pressure in high pressured closed container for the current solid fuel reactors, and even if molten-salt might be released from the container, it would be solid like glass with no response to air. Earthquake-resistance is also accordingly ensured. This provides us with superior safety characteristics compared with any other nuclear reactor systems. (4) Thorium
resources is much more abandant than Uranium
From the fact that thorium resorces
exists over the world and its volume is more than 4 or 5
times of its Uranium, it is supposed that there is no
risk factor of sesources, unlike the situation of
Uranium.
(5) Economy
in Th-MSR generation cost
In Th-MSR , there is no fuel-assembly
fabrication and replacement acquired. In addition, with
almost none of the high-level nuclear waste produced,
its chemical processing cost is resultantly low. Reactor
construction cost is effectively low thanks to its
simple structure. Lower fuel cost than uranium due to
thorium in liquid. It is therefore considered that the
power generation cost of Th-MSR will be significantly
lower than that of current LWR (Light Water Reactor) by
30% or more at least.
(6)
Small-size reactor can be easily accomodated, which
can be globally deployed in the most appropriate
manner and area.
To cope with upcoming various
requirement for small reactors to fit with their
location nature, downsized comapct Th-MSR is possible
bacause of its simple structure, unlike current LWR.
In case of LWR, ecomonical efficiency needs large scale reactors, more than one million kW. On the contrary, the economical efficiency of Th-MSR can be sufficiently affordable with small sized reactors. This will ensure the development of new industry by constructing Th-MSR at remote areas or developing countries. (7)
Reprocessing spent fuel is easy, and less costly:
When thorium is used for the fuel, a
lot of fissile U(Uranium) 233 is produced, with
accompaniment of strong gamma ray a lot. In case of
solid nuclear fuel of Thorium, its reprocesing spent
fuel will force to have much difficulties and high
cost..
On the contrary, in case of Th-MSR, U(Uranium) 233 becomes volatile by injecting fluorine gas into the liquid fuel so that U233 can be separated to make reprocessing easy for its reuse. (8) As
component technologies of Th-MSR already
established, its commercialization needs less time
period and money:
As basic and related component
technologies have already developed, almost none of the
key subjects needs to be developed. The
commercialization of Th-MSR will be accordingly realized
in the short period and less cost.
|
||
Comparison list | |||
History of power generation | |||
Basic Design and Development scheme | |||
Q & A | |||
Link | |||